this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
413 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Gay Steamboat Willie

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

…assuming Poland does respect “the rule of the shorter term”, it seems like Steamboat Willie should be free there as well.

It’s also not clear what triggered this. It might just be YouTube’s ContentID autoflagging stuff, and no one bothered to update the system to recognize that Steamboat Willie is in the public domain. Or, maybe Disney hasn’t updated things on its end (or perhaps it only did so in the US).

What are the chances they’re purposefully sending takedowns? Not hard to believe public domaining procedures aren’t in their muscle memory.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does ContentID even have a concept of copyright limits?

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

It doesn't have a concept of anything really. It just scans against a database of content that certain people have access to populate. Mostly it's large media companies but also somehow a bunch of very tiny rights management companies that people can sign up for to protect their content or commit fraud by claiming remixes and other people's works as their own.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It could be not on purpose.

Did they even build their system with the idea that copyright can expire? This is the first major video work to expire.

In a lot of companies this would be the first feature to be given low priority and sent to the bottom of the backlog. To be done "when we have the time"

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not the first major video work to enter the public domain. Many have entered it before now due to some eccentricities of copyright law.

The 1968 film Night of the Living Dead, for example, entered the public domain immediately upon release because they forgot to include a copyright notice in the film which was a requirement at the time.

The only reason this one is so significant is because it's Disney's property.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also Winnie the Pooh a few years ago

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Only the first literary version, not the 1961 Disney film version (they licensed the rights). So you have to be very careful with what you use. The first book with Tigger included only hit the public domain this year for instance.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

youtube should just turn off geolocking for one week. i bet the earth will continue rotating at nearly the same speed

[–] hal_5700X@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

So Disney being Disney.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago

Can Disney just ******* ***** ** ***** already

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

It was doing it in the US as well to at least one creator I know of.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Seems like those countries are not eligible to use the year 2024 in their dates, then.