this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
511 points (96.7% liked)

Games

32651 readers
1611 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x3x3@lemm.ee 10 points 23 hours ago (25 children)
[–] index@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

Their main business and source of money is a proprietary centralized platform. Mastodon is the opposite.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

Because casual mainstream basic folk (non-techie) don't like the slight legwork you need to do and understand the Fediverse

I saw an article from Yahoo (Source: The Independent) last week about Bluesky's current success from Xitter refugees and it also listed other similar groups like Mastedon. What didn't surprise me is that they said Mastedon is predominantly "techie" which includes the majority of it's user base as "supernerds" with the site having the "steepest learning curve." This was an op-ed from an outsider.

Until Mastedon can appeal to simple minded mainstream basic folk (which is a pretty good size of netizens) it will always be a niche group.

[–] Chewmungus@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Accurate username

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Modva@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (11 children)

That's great, I suppose less concentration to a single platform is a better direction.

Is there less rage and frothing at the mouth on Bluesky? I would imagine whatever ills plague Twitter would also eventually come to Bluesky, because people are there. And people are people. We don't seem to have a solution to the problem - which is a specific subset of people intent on harm, and allowing them direct and wholesale access to the social fabric.

So easy nowadays to fabricate rage-inducing and follower-generating bait. No time for truth and no plan to really get there. How long before we see someone take a stab at a ministry of truth?

[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago

Is there less rage and frothing at the mouth on Bluesky?

Yes, but I think that's temporary. When you have tens of millions of users, that's inevitable. Right now a lot of people are on their honeymoon periods, but I already see sprouts of negative attitude.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›