this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
184 points (98.9% liked)

Memes

53102 readers
406 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In the US, we do not have to worry about this because we outsourced our entire means of production. We are fully-dependent on slave labor, foreign and domestic, just like the founding fathers intended.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

For an in-depth look at modern globalized production and the split between rich exploiter nations and the working poor in the global south, I highly recommend John Smith - Imperialism in the 21st century.

Some good introductory essays before diving into that book:

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

☭ Workers of the world, unite! ☭

My intro Marxist reading list in case anyone wants it

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Seizing the means of production seemed more reasonable when there were actually people producing things. Nowadays seems like it'd be more of the call for a robot uprising.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Commodities are still produced, just largely in the Global South. The Global North needs to re-industrialize and even the load.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Definitely, but the big industrialized stuff that was a focus originally is much more automated now. It's much less glamorous to seize a t shirt or rubber band making plant than a car or tractor factory.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

It isn't about prestige, it'a about working class liberation.