this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
118 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2962 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

pc shop here

BitLocker has caused several phone calls and most of the time a new drive (depending on the integrity of the current drive) and a fresh windows install is the only fix and that usually exposes bad or outdated hardware complicating things more

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

I'm very curious about the vulnerability, but there doesn't seem to be much info (only what MS posted).

How could you possibly bypass bitlocker, unless they write the key to the recovery environment?

[–] Toes@ani.social 7 points 10 months ago

Reminds me of when it was discovered that many hardware implementations used a fixed master key or random seed. Resulting in mass deployments of patches to disable hardware encryption in favour of software mode.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The manual fix requires the recovery partition to be after the OS partition, while my partitions go Recovery, EFI/System, then OS. I guess I'm just SOL? I don't even have BitLocker enabled but an update that won't install is going to be annoying.