this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
533 points (93.2% liked)

Memes

46040 readers
2002 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 16 points 14 hours ago (10 children)

Okedoke, well I just learned that I have no concrete grasp of political labels and need to do a LOT of research.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 25 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Extreme simplification:

Liberalism: supports capitalism. Current system + tweaks

Leftism: supports anticapitalism of some form, the two biggest umbrellas being Marxism/Communism and Anarchism

Marxism/Communism: supports collectivization, public ownership, and central planning (I have an introductory reading list if you want to learn more, or just read Principles of Communism)

Anarchism: supports full horizontalism and networks of communes

[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Thank you for the reading list! I'll take a gander :)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry to say I'm a self aware liberal capitalist. I must say I love to consoom (with some moderation)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

We're the People's Front of Judea, not the FUCKING Judean People's Front!

[–] melisdrawing@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago
[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Near as I can tell, a leftist would do anything to keep a liberal out of power over believing only 75% of the same things as them, and allow the right to take control, but at least they get to keep the moral high ground of not allowing a liberal to do that 25%. Never mind that the right actively opposed everything to leftist wants completely.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Liberals are "the right" and they sure as hell don't believe 75% of the same things as leftists. Leftists in the west also don't really have the power to keep liberals out of power, hence why liberals have consistently been the only ones in power for decades. Liberals on the other hand, absolutely do have the power to keep leftists out, and they will go as far as allying with fascists to murder leftists in their beds.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (6 children)

Liberalism is literally and historically where the left begins. The right is authoritarianism and the left is liberalism to anarchism. Liberals are not leftists but it is a signof a distinct lack of education in political philosophy to claim liberalism as a right wing ideology.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 51 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (15 children)

Unpopular opinion:

Alienating liberals doesn't create more leftists, it only causes people to be dismissive of the term and dig in their heels.
Insulting them rather than educating them does nothing but divide anyone left of center and after the last election I think it's abundantly clear that we need to be unified rather than divided.
No one is going to argue that left leaning candidates aren't far from perfect, but they're a hell of a lot better than the far-right fascists were about to have in power in less than 2 weeks.
Yes, I agree modern liberals are too centrist and ineffective but at the end of the day they're light-years ahead of the far right, and I'd rather be agitated about having another centrist administration than alarmed and outraged at the onset of fascism.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think they really are "light years ahead of the right". Most of the difference as far as I can tell is in how they talk-- not what they do. Liberals fundamentally just believe in the status quo. MLK Jr saw it the same way when he described " the white moderate" as the greatest obstacle to change.

I'm definitely willing to engage liberals (and even conservatives) in honest conversation when I feel the context warrants the effort. Lemmy rarely seems to qualify.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

last election I think it’s abundantly clear that we need to be unified rather than divided.

Who's "we"? Liberals are not on the left and are ideological enemies of the left: you can't be unified with people who fundamentally oppose you.

Also, which election? Oh right, you're one of the those American liberals who think foreigners are fictional characters. That explains why you think leftists would want to ally with the people committing genocide against these "fictional characters"

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

what is the benefit of writing a response with such a hostile tone?

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

What's the benefit of mollycoddleing genocide apologists like Chainweasel?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 22 hours ago (11 children)

Liberals facilitate fascism

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 20 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

That's why it's important to communicate with them rather than alienating them.

[–] gravityowl@lemm.ee 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You're talking as if for over a year (cough decades cough) Palestinian activists hadn't tried talking to the liberals about their party's unshakable support for the ongoing genocide.

What's left to say to people who are "going to pick the lesser of 2 evils" even when you showed them that their pick is still funding the ethnic cleansing of all Palestinian people?

We should talk to general leftist people. Not the liberals. They still value money and profit over people

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

i probably would have taken that liberal stance long ago, but i had people explain their views to me in a good way that eventually made me rethink some of the things i held as truth. its just that it doesnt happen overnight. im not saying anyone will be convinced but the socialist strategy of getting people talking about political topics in a consistent organized way actually helps a lot here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

thats not an unpopular opinion though? maybe on the west? revolutions happen by convincing your fellow brothers, not by force or manipulation.

this is the hard part imo, we all have to go against the media machine.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (24 children)

Gestures at the current state of affairs

I don't think patience is working guys.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Patience was a virtue.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›