this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
80 points (93.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12753 readers
501 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 667@lemmy.radio 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Rule 1 of politics: Answer the question you want, not the question you’re asked.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 hours ago

That works in the US. Other countries have journalists that just keep asking the same question over and over until it's answered

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The data centers made it not rain for six months?

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

If the clouds weren't in the internet then they would be available to rain on the earth.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

No, data centers made them build thousands of homes in areas with greater fire risk

[–] Awkwardly_Frank@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

It would be easy to look at that headline and decry clueless politicians, but a more honest title might read: “Politicians Use Momentum of the Moment to Push for Legislation to Address a Major, Related Issue of Particular Importance to the Region.”

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Blaming anything to avoid the actual issue: Southern California is a desert with unpredictable precipitation, and the state has allowed wealthy interests to hoard water. Also, maybe there are in fact too many damn people down here.

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, blaming climate change for further reducing the precipitation levels is probably accurate.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly it has always been dry

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, but the two decades of drought brought on by rising temperatures and changing weather patterns certainly didn't help.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

So Cal has had erratic weather patterns for as long as they've been keeping records and beyond. Couple that with horrible water management policy and an enormous (and honestly unsustainably large) population, and we end up with the situation we're in now. The fact of the matter is that there already not enough water here, both surface water and ground water, and the sheer amount of people and requirements put a massive burden on the system. This is why LADWP's water wars led to fighting in Owens Valley and why most water has to be imported into the LA basin. And then you have schmucks in the San Joaquin valley constantly trying to take more than their fair share to grow fucking almonds and other bullshit crops that get exported abroad, while charging regular citizens out the ass to take a shower.

Not to say your wrong, but it's disingenuous to ignore the underlying reality and just say climate change. Sure rising temps are a problem, but at this point they're just exacerbating an already problematic system.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 hours ago

Who, uh... approved those data centers?

You don't blame the kid for asking if they can have ice cream for dinner, you blame the parent who allows it.