this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
47 points (79.0% liked)

Linux

56009 readers
1005 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reading about FOSS philosophy, degoogling, becoming against corporations, and now a full-blown woke communist (like Linus Torvalds)

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Linus Torvalds is a "full-blown woke communist"? Citation needed.

I have been a FOSS enthusiast since my preteen or early teenage years (mid-to-late 2000s), yet I am not in any sense a communist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Fuck communist statist, foss is pure anarchism.

[–] AnanasMarko@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Disagree. If FOSS were an anarchism what would be the point of FOSS lincences of which some are very long legal documents? Also corporations would just take your code, say its theirs and tell you to go fuck yourself.

[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Foss licenses are copyleft, they bar individuals from enclosing the commons built by the collective for profit. Anarchism isn’t just letting people do whatever they want. Anarchism means against hierarchy. Having rules that prevent unjustified hierarchies from forming is entirely with in the bounds of anarchism. Including rules that prevent using copyright as a coercive hierarchy.

[–] AnanasMarko@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honest question: "Without any authority who gets to enforce the rules?". Everyone, as they see fit it seems. What makes "your" hierarchy better than "my" hierarchy?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Use the right tool for the job, I say.

I made a decent chunk of change with capitalism. I have a modest house and am well positioned for a middle-class retirement.

Now I work for the government in a field for which I find the capitalist options wanting.

I give away my programming guides for free online with no ads, but sell paper copies of the books for profit.

Could I make more money by charging for the online versions? Sure. But some things are worth more than money.

The quest for money doesn't ruin everything, but it sure ruins a lot of things.

Bell Labs of yore would be my dream company to work for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I honestly don't even know what a Marxist is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›