this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
97 points (87.0% liked)

Linux

48323 readers
919 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been distrohopping for a while now, and eventually I landed on Arch. Part of the reason I have stuck with it is I think I had a balanced introduction, since I was exposed to both praise and criticism. We often discuss our favorite distros, but I think it’s equally important to talk about the ones that didn’t quite hit the mark for us because it can be very helpful.

So, I’d like to ask: What is your least favorite Linux distribution and why? Please remember, this is not about bashing or belittling any specific distribution. The aim is to have a constructive discussion where we can learn about each other’s experiences.

My personal least favorite is probably Manjaro.

Consider:

  • What specific features/lack thereof made it less appealing?
  • Did you face any specific challenges?
  • How was your experience with the community?
  • If given a chance, what improvements would you suggest?
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I don't get the hate for Manjaro, TBH. I never had any problem with it, and I used it as my main OS for a few years now.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

It's fine. People like to shit on it, usually people that have never even tried it.

I've run it for years on many systems and had no issues, which I can't say with most other distros I've tried on and off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RalphWolf@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm going to say Gentoo Linux. It's a good learning tool and I suppose maybe a tiny bit faster if you actually custom-compile everything for your hardware from source, but that's a crazy waste of time.

[–] Cwilliams@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

Agree. The tradeoff of building everything from source just doesn't pay off

[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Pull out your pitchforks, debian.

Don't get me wrong, it's good in a VM or a server, but it's the worst Linux desktop experience I've ever had.

  • Apt sucks, it's the worst package manager imo (and I use Gentoo). Slow, bad a dependency resolution and apt-autoremove nuked my system both times I tried to use debian.

  • It's old. LTS is only good for servers, you cannot change my mind and I don't see a reason to use sid or unstable, when I can use literally why other distro with a better prepare manager.

And it just does some bizarre things, like not setting up sudo with the graphical installer...

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

I agree with you.

I don't hate Manjaro's developers, but they simply do not know what they are doing. They over promise and under deliver.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Manjaro always broke on me. I can't even trust them to keep their SSL certs up to date.

Sorry Manjaro devs, no hate, I just got burned way too many times by this arch-not-arch frankendistro.

[–] tcrash@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Been on it for the last two years. Never broke. Idk what's going on

[–] Joe_0237@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

OpenSUSE, awfull default software selection on desktop, and pushing users hard to use an "everything configuration tool".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kzhe@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

VanillaOS looked really promising but it was terribly buggy when I used it.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago

I think most of their efforts are focused on the upcoming Orchid system, hopefully they smooth out a lot of those things from the original.

[–] lseif@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

Evil Linux Suprise™

idk why people even use it. too scary for me.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

Debian.

Everything is so manual, not even system upgrades or enabling automatic updates. Like, this can be easily scripted using sed, why dont they do that?

It gets outdated very quickly and people complain that their apps are outdated, while Debian is simply shipping an extremely outdated package.

I respect what they do, and maybe for a Server it is a good OS (even though I would trust Fedora with SELinux and quick updates more).

[–] maness300@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fedora. It doesn't really add anything and is just more stuff for people to get distracted by.

Also, red hat is responsible for shilling a lot of bullshit.

[–] JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I tried Fedora aswell and couldn't get behind the package management or GNOME. I'm sure it's trivial to change the DE to something more sane (my tastes lie with Xfce and/or KDE) but I used it for a month and I just went straight back to Manjaro until I could find something better, and ultimately settled on EndeavourOS.

[–] jerrythegenius@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You could try the KDE or XFCE spins

[–] Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago

Probably PoP_OS!. There isn't anything wrong with the os itelf, my problem is rather that its often sugested as a beginer friendly distro which in my experience it absolutely isn't. The amount of issues I encountered while trying to use it almost drove me away from Linux as a whole. (It was the first distro i tried) The time I spent trying to make everything work was comparable to Arch.

I realy like the idea and the DE they ship by default is one of the best ones I've seen (it's like GNOME but in my opinion much better) but the bugs make it a terrible suggestion for new users.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 2 points 10 months ago

Manjaro, because we're here on arch to use the AUR, and that breaks Manjaro basically every time.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›