this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
1209 points (96.3% liked)

Memes

49817 readers
1140 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

difference is that in heaven people dont have need to produce, so presumably no means of production even exist

[–] A_Kanuck@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

Communism is just people trying to create heaven on earth but without God.

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ooh baby, do you know what that's worth?

[–] galanthus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well, it does not have an economy, so why would it have money?

Also, it doesn't have politics and society in the conventional sense, but men are clearly subordinate to God. Christ is king, this is the way Christians think, so I am not sure this is a correct comparison.

The question of "should Christians strive for a classless society" is a complex one. Egalitarian ideals are very new compared to Christianity, but some Christians now think that in the "fallen world" authority is undesirable as it can be abused. This is not common though.

However, Marxism is an anti-religious ideology. Marxists both believe that religion will disappear after "the base" changes and it will become, ultimately, obsolete, and also have historically persecuted and enacted violence on Christians. So I am not surprised there are not many Marxist Christians.

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

"the question of "should Christians strive for a classless society" is a complex one."

Not to the early Christians it wasn't. The early Christians movements (before they were co-opted by Empire) were radically egalitarian.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sure, but comparing what people thought 2000 years ago to what they think now is a fruitless endeavor.

The concept of democracy came about around that time too (at least the Greek one, which arguably wasn't the first but I digress) but should we exclude women and foreigners from it? That's what the early proponents of democracy wanted.

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The concept of democracy came about around that time too (at least the Greek one, which arguably wasn't the first but I digress)

The Athenian concept of democracy had existed for the better part of a millennium by the time Christianity appeared.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm you're right. I thought it was closer to 0 ad, but it looks like it was closer to 600-300 bc.

Doesn't change my point though.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, just because it was written in a book doesn't really means anything, we can change it, create bew editions of the book, even invert the meaning of inconvenient passages. These old code need to be made ambiguous and adaptible, endlessly reinterpretable to suit any situation that the priesthood needs to get themselves out of

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You could literally describe early christianity as the spiritual arm of a revolutionary front.

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

Actually sir, have you considered that religion bad?

I have read a quote by Marx, and am very smart.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›