this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
957 points (96.7% liked)

Memes

45734 readers
683 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pozbo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

So I think the general idea is that you can convert more CO² to carbon in the form of sugars and O² molecules per square foot with algae than with trees. Trees would totally do the same thing if we ripped up all the concrete and buildings to replant a forest, but that process would take decades.

This can be added into existing infrastructure and helps I guess. Kinda a neat concept.

[–] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But they provide little shade 😒

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Knusper@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

I don't even understand which part of the tree experience these tanks are supposed to replace. Are they really just there to pick up CO2? Because you can also plant a forest outside the city for that.

You'll miss out on all the other tree benefits, but so you also will with these glass tanks.

[–] pizza@lemmy.today -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/rLXWqdry3Qc?si=LItEsEzrkK2DTL2D

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

People can grow trees. You need a lot more to make one of those contraptions. Hard to control people when they can just grow a plant to do what they need.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›