this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
108 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63572 readers
329 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sakuragasaki46@feddit.it 2 points 14 hours ago

Guess CloudFlare was evil all along.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

why don't more pirate sites use anubis? cloudflare has always been pro fash trash

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 35 minutes ago

Is Anubis a DNS service? I was under the impression that it was basically just a reverse proxy that you ran, which required a proof-of-work before it would pass the request off to your various services. If that’s the case, it’s doing a fundamentally different job than CloudFlare is. Because the DNS will likely hit CloudFlare before being forwarded to your Anubis. Like the order of the request would be:
User>CloudFlare DNS>Anubis>Site
If that’s the case, using Anubis wouldn’t change the fact that it’s being blocked by CloudFlare.

If Anubis is an actual DNS service, I may need to look into it more for my own use. I hadn’t bothered, because I thought it was more like Nginx.

[–] Coopr8@kbin.earth 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't understand how CloudFlare is intermediating the traffick in this case. How can CloudFlare block the sites if they aren't hosted on CloudFlare or using CloudFlare services? Are they acting as an ISP in the UK?

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They cache a lot of the internet so like the infra of the internet after the isp

[–] Coopr8@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So the ISP redirects the request from the primary host to the CloudFlare cache under some conditions? but wouldn't that be ineffective at blocking the sites of the browser still attempts to pull from the primary host first? I'm assuming this must be mediated by the ISP somehow otherwise it would just be a browser setting to only pull from the primary host of the domain.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Cloudflare operates as a reverse proxy between a user’s browser and the origin server of a website or application. When a user requests a webpage, the request is first routed through Cloudflare’s global network instead of directly to the origin server. Cloudflare then forwards the request to the origin server, retrieves the content, and sends it back to the user.

It is doing that by being authoritative DNS provider and providing useful features in case of attack but imagine that everyone start using cloudflare then it become the authority DNS wise.

[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe it includes dns. Using quad9 would bypass this.

[–] guybrush_threepwood_MP@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I bumped into at least one site blocked by cloudflare. When accessing the site, I'm redirected to:

https://www.cloudflare-terms-of-service-abuse.com/stream.ts

So far it happens when I try the landing page of the site, if I go pages I visited in the past I can reach the intended site. Maybe the name resolution is cached.

I haven't tested it much but I'm using Quad9 and it's not making any difference.

Cloudflare seems to be the SOA for the affected sites and then it sets *.ns.cloudflare.com as the primary source and dns.cloudflare.com as the administrator.

To my understanding Quad9, being a recursive DNS resolver, is not the main DNS authority in this case. Quad9 will reach out to cloudflare to refresh the records when the TTL expires and then cloudflare can return a different IP for the domain.

Either affected sites stop using cloudflare, or we reach them via TOR, if they have that option.

[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It happened to me once with 1337x redirecting to that stream.ts, i deleted the prepending "www." and it worked again.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's almost as if making one organisation the gatekeeper to a quarter of the internet is a bad idea...

[–] sakuragasaki46@feddit.it 3 points 14 hours ago

I recently had issues because CloudFuck blocked the IP of one of my VPS's effectively breaking npm (JavaScript package manager)

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

A quarter only?

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago
[–] laconiancruiser@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The constant stream of piracy related utilities that end in "rr" never ceases to amuse me.

Bonus joke! "What's a pirate's favourite letter of the alphabet?"

(People often say Arrrrr! here, especially if you seed that context earlier in the conversation)

"You'd think so, but actually it's C"

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't get it ..unless qbt is written in C

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's because C sounds like "sea". It's a joke that's more about the sea-faring kind of pirate than the online kind

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

Ahhh ...ha haha...ha...............ha

[–] breb@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

are there any alternatives?