this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
849 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

51533 readers
975 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
849
6÷2(1+2) (programming.dev)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by wischi@programming.dev to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

https://zeta.one/viral-math/

I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.

It's about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it's worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I'm probably biased because I wrote it :)

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Very cool article on an aspect of math that I've never thought too deeply about before 👍

[–] kuneho@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

isn't that division sign I only saw Americans use written like this (÷) means it's a fraction? so it's 6÷2, since the divisor (or what is it called in english, the bottom half of the fraction) isn't in parenthesis, so it would be foolish to put the whole 2(1+2) down there, there's no reason for that.

so it's (6/2)*(1+2) which is 3*3 = 9.

the other way around would be 6÷(2(1+2)) if the whole expression is in the divisor and than that's 1.

tho I'm not really proficient in math, I have eventually failed it in university, but if I remember my teachers correctly, this should be the way. but again, where I live, we never use the ÷ sign, only in elementary school where we divide on paper. instead we use the fraction form, and with that, these kind of seemingly ambiguous expressions doesn't exist.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

The real question here is BODMAS or PEMDAS?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›