this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
540 points (99.6% liked)

Fediverse

28465 readers
455 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 80 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

So I looked them up with my Mastodon account to try to follow but quickly discovered that not all searches for 'BBC' lead to accounts related to the BBC...l.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

News. You need to add the word news to your search. I'm just waiting for someone to name a large organization DILF. That's going to be hilarious.

[–] rar@discuss.online 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There was the Moro Islamic Liberation Front in Philippines.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Oh God. At least that's a college level research topic. If you end up on that page it's because you wanted to be there.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Wait...

I want a news alert set up whenever porn stars get boned by rather large phalluses belonging to those with darker complexions.

If I want that, what search terms should I use?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Nath@aussie.zone 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You are very helpful and correct - thank you for that. I suspect it was something of a double entendre joke, however.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You may be onto something.... /s

(I almost went with British Broadcorping Castration...)

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

social.bbc

LMAO

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 78 points 9 months ago

I quite like the way that reads. It sounds like some people within the BBC are quite forward thinking.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Has it been 6 months already?

Well written and glad to see professional outlets sharing their experience with Activity Pub.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

It's like running your own email server in the early 2000s. For large businesses it totally makes sense.

Hobbiests can do it to if they are interested.

Most people will land at a "shared" service and let someone else handle the admin tasks. I'm afraid that eventually there might only be "outlook.com, gmail.com, and yahoo.com" so to speak, because it's just the easy way to go for most people and economies of scale make it more feasible for the operators who find ways to get paid.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

People misunderstand what federation needs to do. Email is a great model.

It's fine to have big providers. What federation does is limit the fuckery possible. Imagine what would happen if GMail started charging $8 a month.

Having the option for competition doesn't mean you have to use it. It's enough that it's possible.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

But people self host email today, and there are many more email orgs around including private work email and specialised services such as Proton mail focusing on privacy and security. It's a good analogy.

An open standard like Mastodon will allow big players but also niche and small players, who can focus on specific communities or offering specific spins.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Totally agree. The smtp protocol server to server interoperability made email all work smoothly across many federated hosts and I think ActivityPub is more or less designed with a similar strategy, except for defederations. I guess the equivalent would be blocking spam at your smtp gateway, lol.

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do people actually self host mail? I remember watching some conference that said it is basically a full time job nowadays to get your mails actually delivered if you're not one of the big providers. Much easier to pay one of them and just use a custom domain instead, and I can easily see this being a thing for the fediverse one day too (assuming it ever gets big enough)

[–] bazmatazable@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

I selfhost my own email and you are absolutely correct it is musch easier to receive than to send. I use a 3rd party to send all my outgoing mail on my behalf.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

All large news orgs and NGOs need to do the same - federate their server which becomes the source of truth, and then mirror the content over other social media which is not federated. This may or may not include Twitter. I imagine that over time having news and reporting across social media will diminish any advantage Twitter possesses and then news orgs / NGOs might decide if they want their content on a platform like Twitter that cannot be bothered with things like stamping out bots, trolls, inauthentic actors, or supporting a free and fair press.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 points 9 months ago

And governments and politicians should set up their own servers too.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 23 points 9 months ago

Come on CBC! Follow their lead. And hell, while we're at it RCMP please.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 9 months ago

@BBCRD@social.bbc for anyone on a microblog capable platform (not lemmy)

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago

Good job Fediverse and Mastodon users. I'm glad as a group, we are generally behaving well.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


We were aiming to learn about how much work and cost this involved, how many people we’d reach, what levels of engagement we would get and to explore the risks and benefits of the federated model.

The trial so far has been really effective in helping us learn about how the Fediverse is evolving, what technical support a Mastodon server needs, what the costs are, and how a large media organisation like the BBC can engage with the many different overlapping communities that exist in this rapidly changing space.

We are also planning to start some technical work into investigating ways to publish BBC content more widely using ActivityPub, the underlying protocol of Mastodon and the Fediverse.

Reassuringly, most of the comments and feedback have been positive, welcoming both our interest and the way we have set things up.We’ve had really encouraging levels of engagement(i.e. replies, re-posts and likes) on Mastodon.

Because this an experiment and a trial, it's not always the main priority for all the teams involved, so we may not be able to engage and reply as much as the Mastodon community and culture expect, and we recognise this could be an issue going forward.

Because of the potential sensitivity around news stories, we need to be particularly careful with our editorial processes and within the scope of this trial we are not in a position to guarantee time and effort from other teams outside of R&D.


The original article contains 692 words, the summary contains 240 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] shinomoroll@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

While in the meantime, in the land of Mozilla, investment in Mastodon are reduced...

[–] JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I realise that the overlap between Mastodon users and BBC Radio 3 listeners is likely me and me alone but I wish they'd add an account for it.

I suppose the reasoning behind it would be that 4 & 5 are the talk stations.

[–] mwalimu@baraza.africa 8 points 9 months ago

I like the testing and hopefully they will share more detailed research findings in the next 6months. Especially on content moderation knowing they have decades of experience on this.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Outsourcing administration instead of doing it in house would be much cheaper for news orgs in the long run I'd think. Volunteer admins is one thing. Staff admins is another.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

They already have the staff, this would just be a project current staff manages.