this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
32 points (90.0% liked)

Linux

63125 readers
623 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Wasn't MATE forked from GNOME?

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 20 minutes ago

MATE exists because people loved GNOME 2 and hated GNOME 3.

[–] sushiatnight@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago

GNOME 2, but yes.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 24 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Dad joke time: Mostly the Aussies!

[–] ksh@aussie.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

Seagulls in Finding Nemo

[–] Snaffy@programming.dev 3 points 21 hours ago

You wot mate?

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I have a cup of mate every morning, yes.

Mate is one of those desktops that I occasionally consider, and it's definitely something I could see myself using. Mate is certainly a cool project and I hope it stays around. It reminds of my early days with GNOME - before the bad thing happened and darkness descended on that project.

I hope they get Wayland going eventually.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 18 minutes ago

It IS the early days of GNOME. MATE started with the source code of the last GNOME 2 release.

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

I do. I've been on MATE for 8 or 9 years now. I like GNOME 2 environment a lot, lightweight, still looks nice, has a "classic" PC interface compared to tabletified looking icons. It just works.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I prefer XFCE for lightweight uses (e.g. VM or raspberry Pi) and KDE for normal desktop use.

For me MATE isn't quite light enough for lightweight when XFCE is there, and no where near attractive or pleasant enough for day-to-day use when RAM/CPU use isn't a bottleneck. KDE is certainly more resource intense but up to 1gb of RAM and 1-3% CPU idle for a full featured, slick desktop environment is worth it.

I don't really see the appeal of MATE unless you strongly want a GNOME 2 desktop. In which case, yes it makes sense. Although ironically you can make a very close but modern take on GNOME 2 with KDE with modern bells and whistles if you're willing to customise KDE - it's that flexible.

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago

Got Debian with MATE on a couple of my computers. It's easy on the eyes and easy on system resources. I like that its file manager lets you expand folders so I have that installed on my XFCE machines too.

[–] fratermus@piefed.social 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

In the past I've mainly used XFCE or openbox because of my old hardware. A couple years ago I picked a Debian+MATE image to install on a fresh box and have been using it by default since then.

None of that "touchscreen UI uber alles" BS.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Hey me too. Debian + mate

[–] noughtnaut@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I do! I switched from KDE 3.5 (whenever that was current). I love KDE's approach to making everything adjustable (as opposed to Gnome's "you'll get one button and you better love it") but with KDE 4 on the horizon it seemed to bloat too much for my tastes.

I love how it's a (for me) perfect mix of making a ton of things adjustable while appearing extremely no-frills. Easy on the ram, CPU, and eyes. 👌

[–] nyan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

I switched from KDE 3.5 (whenever that was current).

Terrifyingly, I think someone is still maintaining KDE 3.5 proper for OpenSUSE. Then there's TDE, which is widely available. (But you probably mean 15-20 years ago.)

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 6 points 22 hours ago

I've been using mate basically forever. Installed it for some people. I like it better than any other.

[–] phar@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

I've jumped around a lot. Mate is great and a little more lightweight than some others. I definitely prefer Mate over Xfce. Still like KDE by far far the best, but Mate is my second.

[–] Levi@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I am at the moment, but I'm thinking of switching to XFCE.

I switched to Mate originally because Cinnamon always runs out of memory and starts slowing down over time. If they fixed the memory issues I'd probably prefer Cinnamon.

[–] winni@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

using mate on my Raspis, moved to cinnamon on anything more powerful

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 0 points 21 hours ago

What's better about cinnamon?