this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
283 points (97.6% liked)

Linux

64115 readers
630 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not strictly Linux..

But after reading about SystemD I realised that TempleOS would fall under the laws but there's no way in hell that's getting updated. There's gotta be some amazing way to troll the lawmakers with this.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fmtx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 102 points 1 week ago

"Does anyone else find it weird that all the Linux users were born on Jan 1st, 1970?"

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, and I'd say it's a bit questionable whether California even has jurisdiction over revelations from God himself.

Also, I don't think it does networking and app stores 😄

[–] lime@feddit.nu 48 points 1 week ago

there is a networking module in the Shrine fork. i think its internal name is "heretic" as it is against god's will.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a bit hard for him to comply. Why, you ask? Well, for starter, he's dead.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

The glowies got to him!

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"You wouldn't ask to put age verification on a Bible would you mister representative?"

[–] msage@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If those people actually read the bible, they would never let a child near it.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they actually read the Bible, they would never ~~let a child near it~~ go near a child.

ftfy

[–] msage@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think the bible cures pedophilia.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 1 points 12 hours ago

Well of course it doesn't, God does.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Depends on the velocity of the bible.

[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Now I'm imagining 9mm bibles flying... thank you for that image.

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 35 points 1 week ago (5 children)

SystemD is only adding the possibility to store an age for the user, and the PR is being debated still

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why would a glorified scheduling service need to store my birthday? Or age. Am I soon supposed to show/store my ID to all services running on my computer?

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 8 points 1 week ago

An equally valid question is why does a glorified scheduling service want to act as my UEFI boot manager?

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The systemd service in question is probably already managing your accounts (if you've got systemd, that is)

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It may be so, but it doesn't know my birthday nor my ID 🤷

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 1 points 1 week ago

And it won't unless something else tells it

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the point people are making here is why does systemd need to store an age for the user.

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It can already store location data and other random metadata

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Define "location data".

Systemd stores location data for unit files, it does not store geo lookup data. Again, why does systemd need to store user age?

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 2 points 1 week ago

It can store your location data (i.e City/Address), because this service is specifically a user database. The systemd init isn't storing your age anytime son.

[–] msage@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago

Trojan horse, so to speak.

Preemtive capitulation is a loss for everyone but the fascists.

[–] org@lemmy.org 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good way to lose your market share overnight

[–] Bilbo@hobbit.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are a lot of Linux distros. Capitulation to age verification is a good way to know that a distro is compromised generally. Now I need to figure out how not to use systemd.

[–] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

If you have some Linux experience, you could try something like void linux , alpine or gentoo. Sadly, systemd is entrenched so deeply on most distros that removing it would be painful.

There is also devuan (debian without systemd) but I can't recommend it.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

If I ever find systemd-ageverificationd on my computer I'm nuking it

[–] moody@lemmings.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TempleOS would fall under the laws

So would DOS and Windows 95, but those haven't had any updates in a couple years. Surely they'll be updated to comply.

[–] MissingGhost@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

FreeDOS' latest version is from 2025. Guess they would be required to comply. They don't even have user accounts...

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm getting to old for this age verification bullshit.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 11 points 1 week ago

Those getting too old for this are the ones who are 14

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Let me guess, you're 2147483647

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

there is no way on hell, but there may be a way in heaven

[–] Qey@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Oh crap, why didn't you tell me this earlier?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

I'm still super impressed by homie doing this all on his own. Rest in power homie, wish you sought out professional help.

[–] jokeyrhyme@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

this new anti-systemd sentiment reminds me of anti-TPM and anti-SecureBoot sentiment

having TPMs and SecureBoot on Linux machines has only ever empowered device owners to ensure that the software on their devices has not been tampered with

there's never been a case where these technologies were used against Linux device owners

likewise, I predict that Linux device owners may find the age field useful for certain opt-in parental controls, but we'll otherwise look back on this and shrug at the extreme paranoia