this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
139 points (97.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21101 readers
719 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 41 points 5 days ago

For anyone confused: refused by the gas station

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Back when he became a temple undertaker in 2005, the crematorium still used charcoal, and over the years, it upgraded to an electric crematorium powered by diesel.

TIL there's electric crematorium

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

Same, so I had a quick search.

It's fairly interesting

https://dfweurope.com/electric-cremator/

[–] Jakule17@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

An electric crematorium powered by diesel

What?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is immensely more efficient to run a generator and collect/use that power precisely than to combust it and use that power directly.

[–] Jakule17@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've heard of something like that, but at this point couldn,'t they just plug it into a socket?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It depends on the amount of power available at mains vs what is needed. If they need more amperage than mains can handle, a genny is about the only option unless they’re willing to pay for more electrical infrastructure assuming it’s available.

[–] Jakule17@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Guess that kinda makes sense, thanks

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If there's a fuel shortage, maybe using it on cremations isn't the best use...

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Cremation is big here in Japan for a few reasons, but one is very pragmatic: there's not enough space to bury everyone on the land we have, particularly anywhere near their family. I'm not sure if this is an issue in Thailand as well or how big of one if so, but they also have a lot of jungle.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Personally, I think we (as a species) give far more reverence to the dead than they warrant, but I completely accept that this is a sensitive topic for some people and that I'm an extreme outlier here. I see no problem with grave re-use, mass cremations or burials, or really any other disposal method; as far as I'm concerned the only factor that really needs to be taken into account is sanitation. If someone was important enough to warrant a permanent monument, build one, but the insistence that that monument exist over the physical place where their remains once existed feels pointless to me.

Cremation is certainly preferable to graveyards, though. That's always just felt like an immense waste of space, to me.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago

We have grave re-use here, but it's kinda hard to explain (especially for me coming from the outside). Graves are family graves and bones (or maybe just some small portion) get moved to an inner temple after so much time.

There are, of course, grave costs, upkeep costs, etc. which are, frankly, insane in many cases, but that's just my opinion.

[–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

okay so im baf at geography, but is thailand either floody or swampy?

Coffins (and the big cement boxes theyre put in) have a lot of air in them. They're actually pretty empty. There's a phenomenon where, after sever flooding, coffins pop oit of the ground from bouyancy. Very creepy

The same thing happens with underground propane tanks, which seem to be better regulated.

[–] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think what happens to the dead is kinda important. If you Bury the dead you also need to fuel the excavator somehow. No one's digging a grave by hand.

Maybe driving a car when riding a bicycle could do the trick isn't the best use. Last week Thursday I took the bike to work. 10 km. No big deal, it's an E-Bike and it takes me 25 minutes. I've never seen so many cars on the road and I thought these people couldn't afford fuel? This is in a small city of 90k people by the way. Anyone who lives in this city can take a bicycle and would have to travel less than I do, no matter where they are. I literally come from outside the city.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

Buddhists cremate, they don't bury people in coffins.

They don't have to use diesel, but anything other than cremation isn't really an option in this situation

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You can dig a grave by hand lmao, unless you live in America or another similar country where people are physically unable to. Judging by your use of km I'm assuming it's not the US in particular though

[–] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure bruv, you go dig a grave by hand. We'll see how long it takes. It's possible, sure. But sensible? Not so much.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's literally what gravediggers do though?

Not that they have much work these days, everyone's going for cremation and then bury a small urn, so the grave doesn't take much time to dig. But till now, yes, graves have been dug by humans. Letting noisy and polluting excavators into a graveyard, which is supposed to be a place of quiet contemplation and respect for the dead, would be preposterous. Why even dig a grave if not out of respect for the dead, and what kind of respect are you showing by having a machine do it all in 5 minutes?

Here's a 14 year old article about the gravedigging profession and how they have less work nowadays

Here's an 8 year old article about an 83 year old gravedigger. If he could still do it, so could anyone (except for people with actual disabilities of course).

Both in Estonian, but you can translate it.

Sure bruv, you go dig a grave by hand.

I've dug one myself, for most we've used a professional gravedigger's service though.

We’ll see how long it takes

Usually it's not really done for efficiency. It's not particularly efficient to have a bunch of people sit around for a wake either, if they could all be at work instead. It's all a ritual essentially.

Anyway, you can have it done in a day if you're not a professional. You can also take turns with another family member so one could rest while the other is working. Hell, do it in a group of 3-4 and you can share stories about the deceased. Like I said, it's a ritual. Doing it alone would be quite miserable of course.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 days ago

If you don't cremate bodies, they decompose quickly. If you don't use gas for cars, people get to work slightly later and have to learn to use public transit.