this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
49 points (96.2% liked)

Games

16858 readers
715 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago

Nintendo's not the kind of company to do it, but a Mario 64 2 would be great right about now. Make everything adorably fake and lo-fi, like with puffy trees made of overlapping circles instead of intersecting spheres, but modernized enough to still clip models sensibly. Dropping JPG'd leaves while you climb them, which obey subtle wind everywhere outdoors, along with octagonal flower patches that'd otherwise sway randomly. Just plus the hell out of everything. Make it vibe the way the original did when nobody knew any better. Build a tiny world vaguely evoking a bigger one, but then pack it full of more details and oddities than any one person would ever notice. Any time a playtester gets to some hard-to-reach nook and is disappointed nothing happens, tell a dev to put stuff there. Y'know, 'bring this flowerpot to the aquarium and there's a secret dolphin level' kinda nonsense. A game that looks like it weighs ten megabytes and has a strategy guide an inch thick.

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Super Mario Wonder was pretty solid, but kind of short. It would have been a great buy at $30, but Nintendo do Nintendo stuff so it's $50+ forever.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wonder is way more replayable than Mario Bros U, it's also continuing to charm the heck out of me in a way that a Mario game hasn't since Sunshine. I am very satisfied with my purchase.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I am glad you like it but no way can I agree with it being replayable.

I found it so boring and off, like a really well polished clone. Didn't have the feel or look of a mario game just the right physics for the most part.

I got it for €30 so I don't feel wronged but I would be pissed if I had paid full price for it. SMBU is a modern classic to me, new elements that matched the style and feel of the franchise.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Nintendo will never drop their prices since people keep buying their games at those prices even long after the release date. Switch has an attach rate of 8 games and most of those games are Nintendo games. When people buy a Switch for the first time they buy it with Nintendo games. Nintendo isn’t competing with anyone on their console, hence why their games rarely go on sale.