Quetzalcutlass

joined 1 year ago
[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

If it worked anything like the GLOO Cannon from Prey, I would have been satisfied even if it were the only major innovation in the episode.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

The downfall began when Ubisoft abruptly wrote Lucy out of the story after Kristen Bell asked for more money. Then they killed off the literal main character one game later, and nowadays you'd be excused for forgetting Desmond ever even existed given how little the modern day matters to the plot.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And to complete the trifecta, there's also Aseprite for pixel art (it's free if you compile it yourself).

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 90 points 2 months ago (2 children)

To paraphrase an old tweet: "parentheses - for when every thought comes with bonus sub-thoughts".

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Three things in CS meet the qualifications for arcane runes: complex regular expressions, pointer arithmetic, and bit shifting.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Ponder Stibbons inserts another punch card into Hex. Ants flow through tubes and gears begin turning.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Megumin's other problem is she only specced into things that would improve her explosion's damage output, neglecting basic mage things like mana capacity and efficiency. So she can only cast one (stupidly overpowered) explosion spell before all but passing out from using more mana than she actually has. It's why no other party would take her, because even in situations where the spell would be useful she becomes a massive liability after casting it.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

"Exploration is one of the central pillars of our gameplay. That's why we're offering this handy little DLC to instantly fill out your map!"

I've seen that kind of DLC a few times for open world games and it's always jarring.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We could also have "karma" on Lemmy, but while technically tracked the environment is better off without it being public in my opinion. I view voting records similarly.

It's strange that they removed total account karma visibility a while back but are now thinking about making votes public.

I think a good compromise (since Lemmy already tracks that data) would have been to show the upvote/downvote ratio a user receives on their profile page, without showing their total karma. That'd help you spot toxic users without incentivising karma whoring.

Similarly, a display of how often a user upvotes versus downvotes others would help spot bots and trolls without completely obliterating privacy like their suggestion would.

(But ultimately none of this solves the problem of privacy on the Fediverse being one federated bad actor away from nonexistence)

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There are two things I can't stand in this world: people who are intolerant of other people's cultures... and the Dutch.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The game made over a billion dollars but disappeared from the cultural zeitgeist almost immediately. Of course the publisher only cares about that first part, so unnecessary sequel it is!

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What I meant by it being too late is that once you're a billionaire, you can fund your interests (like making the world a worse place) off the passive income you make from interest and investments. Licensing fees are probably a drop in the bucket at this point. Even if she makes tens of millions less due to a massive boycott (which is wildly optimistic), it wouldn't affect her life or political activities a smidgeon.

And since Hogwarts Legacy was the game that finally dethroned Call of Duty and random sports games as the top seller of 2023, I doubt a boycott would be at all effective. Harry Potter was many people's childhood, and they'll buy it regardless of external factors just to finally live in that world.

Edit: I fully support anyone who chooses to boycott Rowling and anything associated with her. It makes sense to not want to support her in any way. I just wanted to point out the unfortunate truth that a boycott won't actually hurt Rowling or her disgusting political activism in any meaningful way, outside of maybe bruising her ego. She's not beholden to public image like a corporation is, so she won't even make a token effort to appear less awful.

view more: next ›