Technology

59495 readers

3135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

107

An ‘Interview’ With a Dead Luminary Exposes the Pitfalls of A.I. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A radio station in Poland fired its on-air talent and brought in A.I.-generated presenters. An outcry over a purported chat with a Nobel laureate quickly ended that experiment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So, lie?

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

You are anthropomorphizing it. It can give truth or falsehood the same as pages of a book or a funhouse mirror.

If you ask me today, "what is the meaning of life?" I might give you an answer. And if you ask me tomorrow, I might give a different one. You have no way of knowing whether I'm correct today, tomorrow, or ever. But if one of those answers, right or wrong, helps you find meaning, it's still useful. (As a rhetorical point. I'm definitely the last person anyone should look to to find meaning.)

AI is a lot like that. You give it input, it gives you output, and whether you get anything of value depends greatly on what you are looking for.

I've gotten some advice on improving some of my writing. And some of the advice I took, some I ignored, and some I modified before using. I think the writing turned out better, and since I largely write for myself I'm pretty happy with that.

I've asked it for help programming, and at times it was helpful and other times cost me hours circling around the same old wrong answers, but there's every chance I would've struggled just as much looking online.

The other day my daughter was making a slushie and it was turning out really wet and gross, so I explained to an AI what we'd done and asked if it had any idea why it didn't turn out. And it turns out, we were using zero sugar soda which doesn't work—the sugar is necessary. So we added some simple syrup and it turned out perfectly.

And it was much faster and easier than Google. But if the advice had been wrong, nothing of value would've been lost.