this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
1542 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
3115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 39 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Cool, now bring back single cab light trucks with full length beds.

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Id settle just for a truck that isnt very clearly pandering "im a big boy!" energy. There all way too fucking big for no god damn reason other than validation of ego. Bunch of weak fucking man babies need some million ton 3 lane wide truck just so they can pretend theyre a big strong man to themselves and everyone else, despite never using the truck for what its purpose is supposed to be.

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I have heard that the reason for this is that trucks in that size range are less regulated by the EPA. Companies didn't want to put in the research to develop trucks that met emissions standards, so they just make them really heavy for no purpose, evading regulations. Take this with a grain of salt, because I've done zero research of my own on it.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

I'd buy an electric one. I don't need to haul a trailer or anything huge.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)