lightnsfw

joined 2 years ago
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

No there aren't and I consider that to be a big problem. As I said before I don't think you should be allowed to put other people's images online without their consent. That said I can see when someone has a smartphone out and pointed at my face so I can tell them to stop filming me or move out of the frame. I cannot tell whether a pair of smart glasses are filming or not or even if they are smart glasses which makes them a bigger privacy issue.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Unless these companies are offering some means for the rest of us to restrict smart glass wearers from filming whenever the fuck they want the only sane option is to treat them as if they are doing it all the time.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

They factually are. Stop fucking lying. It to 10 seconds to look this up. https://www.meta.com/help/ai-glasses/1384089832459749/

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 4 days ago (6 children)

The same way smartphones do, either streaming it or by uploading to whatever cloud "backup" they're connected to. Again, I should not have to explain this to you.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 5 days ago (8 children)

You think Facebook smart glasses aren't sending the video anywhere? Their entire business model is harvesting data on people.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 24 points 6 days ago

So can all his coworkers sue them because they have to look at this bigoted piece of shit every day?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

US cities are doing it too, but I just avoid urban areas as much as possible regardless.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Snapping a photo or video of your family or a landmark for your personal memories that happens to have some other people in the background is a hell of a lot different than sending a constant stream of everyone you're looking at along with location data to Facebook, Google, the government, and whoever the fuck else. I shouldn't have to explain this to you. And yes if you're going to be uploading someones image online I do think you should have their permission.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 6 days ago (20 children)

Something being legal doesn't make it morally correct and the rest of us should oppose this shit in every way we can, not simply expect it.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 6 days ago (26 children)

There's degrees of privacy. People don't deserve to be recorded 24/7 just because they happen to be outside.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

Most of the women I've actually talked to about it are either asexual or have practically no sex drive so take this with a grain of salt, but I think it mostly comes down to men being more "visual" and a lot of this new technology facilitates that. The women I've talked to all prefer porny literature which the only technology I can think of that helps with that would be LLMs.

As for why men can't resist being creepy with it, I think the majority can. Those who can't have shitty impulse control and being horny overrides their better sense. Not that that's an excuse.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 20 points 1 week ago (28 children)

They're not worse, but having yet another thing invading our privacy in public IS worse. No sense in giving up even more ground.

view more: next ›