this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
569 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dditty@lemm.ee 27 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Yet another reason to not do auto-updates in an enterprise environment for mission-critical services.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 41 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

In an enterprise environment, you rely on a service that tracks CVEs, analyzes which ones apply to your environment, and prioritizes security critical updates.
The issue here is that one of these services installed a release upgrade because Microsoft mislabelled it as security update.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Should still be doing phased rollouts of any patches, and where possible, implementing them on pre-prod first.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For security updates in critical infrastructure, no. You want that right away, in best case instant. You can't risk a zero day being used to kill people.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even security updates can be uncritical or supercritical. Consult the patch notes or get burned lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)