this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
145 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16912 readers
364 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That "Palworld vs Pokemon comparison" thing has to be a joke, right? "These two creatures look similar, so obviously one of them is a blatant ripoff" and "these two creatures don't look similar, but obviously one of them is a blatant ripoff" lmao

Gonna buy another copy of Palworld just to spite Wesley Yin-Poole and Nintendo

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm only a minor fan of Pokemon (in that I played them years ago and sometimes revisit an old one), and I've never played Palworld. I knew that it was accused of being similar with the catching critters and whatnot and always kinda scoffed at that idea too. But this article is the first time I've ever seen the designs side by side like that. Some of them are pretty egregious, imho.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Some of them are extremely similar, but there were over 3,000 existing Pokemon designs as of Palworld's release. It would be a statistical wonder if none of them looked similar, especially when our criteria can be as loose as "fire fox" and "Anubis"

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where are you getting 3,000 from?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://www.cbr.com/just-how-many-pokmon-are-there-really/

Between original Pokemon, shinies, regional versions, and weird upgrades like gigantamax or whatever

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, shinies are a palette swap, no? I don't really know if I'd call that a different design.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gonna buy another copy of Palworld just to spite Wesley Yin-Poole and Nintendo

doubt

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I didn't say I'd buy it right now lol