this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
194 points (70.8% liked)
Greentext
4437 readers
874 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's called assault and it is a crime.
No it isn't when there's probable cause. And "dude started running after me" is enough for self defense to kick in. Actually it is probably enough to charge the dude.
OP was just walking. Where are you getting this running idea from?
Literally says "speeds up my steps as well".
Speed walking and running are distinctly different things.
Intentionally causing a person to fear harm is assault. Greentext is committing assault. It might not be possible to convict for it, but it's still assault.
They had legitimate reason to believe they were in danger. ~~Not assault at all.~~ Unlikely to be assault.
Edit: Guess I shouldn’t say “definitely not assault”. Don’t have all the information here, so can’t come to any definitive conclusions.
Legitimate reason as in "a man is in the range of visibility"?
A man, in a hoodie, that speeds up his step when they try to walk away from him faster, at 2am. Context matters a lot here.
It’s more than just “a man within range of vision”. Obviously we don’t have the full story here, but even in the text, there are specific behaviors that would, arguably, make a reasonable person suspect they were in imminent danger. Depending on the state, that is enough to trigger self-defense definition.
The entire greentext is about OP going out of their way to look as threatening as possible while still having plausible deniability. Like... Your position goes against the OPs intent.