this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
406 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] linguine@feddit.rocks 70 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Sounds like a link tax, not actually reproducing any written content. I really dislike link taxes, they're gonna break the internet at some point if they don't see pushback.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If the code automatically shows the article or summarizes it without clicking on the link, then yeah, that's infringement. It should only show the title and the link imo.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Except the summary is almost always literally the content the sites ask the sites linking them to show.

They have "please show this preview instead of a boring plain link" code.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This. They even provide the cover image to use. If they don't want embedding they could just block the request.

But they don't want to. They want to sell the cake and eat it too.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They want to sell the cake and eat it too..

Or they want to sell the cake and get paid for it.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More like: They want to sell the cake and be paid when you recommend it to others.

Mind that news media don't pay when they link to social media, quote people, or even report what other media has reported. The real question is, if this law has any beneficial effect for society. I don't see how.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mind that news media don't pay

That's exactly what (maybe) violates the law.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You think people should pay X to link to tweets? Or generally for quotes?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, I'm not saying anything about 'should'.

It's about a lawsuit here, and I have told that this may be what has violated the law.

The court will tell you for sure, in the end.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Misunderstanding. The news media is suing X. I pointed out what news media does without paying.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It should only show the title and the link imo.

That's infringement in Europe, which makes it effectively a link tax.

load more comments (14 replies)