this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
836 points (96.1% liked)

Greentext

4452 readers
506 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] shasta@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe they got confused and assumed it would run on a different cpu? Is there another language that does it that way? No, now I'm confusing myself.

[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Various languages have various features to make multi threading/concurrent programming easier. Without knowing what language the green text is fanboying for instead of Java it's hard to know what their specific gripe is. Supporting true multi threading out of the box has always been a priority of Java so I don't know what they're complaining about. Generally languages that people praise over Java like Python and JavaScript do not feature true multi threading. (Although Python is getting closer or there now that the GIL is optional.)