Linux

48310 readers

645 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

451

Unity’s Open-Source Double Standard: the ban of VLC (mfkl.github.io)

submitted 10 months ago by TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz to c/linux@lemmy.ml

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Another good lesson about why we should trust only FOSS ecosystems

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

edit: The following is off topic, but I'll.leave it as a testament to my gray-beardedness. In my defense: Unity isn't Unity anymore. Don't get old.

I've been using Linux for 30 years now, and for a while I was an advocate for Ubuntu and Canonical (among others, I'm pan-distributive). Then things changed: GNOME 3, Wayland, Unity, something-sonething, Snaps... All too much.

As an advocate, I'm apt not to emerge with favorites, or to yuck others' yums. Neverthekess, Canonical is a press beyond the pale, many days.

In the end, I don't recommend Canonical distros. LMDE is solid, as are most of the *bian and redhat downstreams. I don't recommend the others because I don't know them, but more importantly I couldn't help a friend un-bodge a bad installer on them (likewise for "BSD or Darwin).

But really, no love for Canonical. They went to some Dark Side, and I'll have a hard time forgiving them for it.

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

I also thought of Unity the DE before reading the article

I understand the confusion. This doesn't belong to a Linux community. I mean, I see the relation with FOSS but I'm sure there are FOSS communities out there. The article doesn't even mentions Linux, just Windows and Android.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You do realize this is about the Unity game engine, right?

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I do now. See edits upthread.

[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This is about the Unity game engine, not the unrelated Unity desktop shell from Canonical.

[–] dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Well said nevertheless. Both suck.

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yes understood. See edts up thread

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

With ibm working hard to enshittify redhat even faster than newredhat themselves, we should consider avoiding them as a first-class porting and work target.

Look at OpenEL as a successor to the RH and an upstream for the other ELs once RH starts eating from that tasty "free stuff they can sell" trough. Having made bank on TheForeMan without actually making an effort to support it, they have a model they can use for everything.