Transitive defederation -- defederating from instances that federate with Threads as well as defederating from Threads -- isn't likely to be an all-or-nothing thing in the free fediverses. Tradeoffs are different for different people and instances. This is one of the strengths of the fediverse, so however much transitive defederation there winds up being, I see it as overall as a positive thing -- although also messy and complicated.

The recommendation here is for instances to consider #TransitiveDefederation: discuss, and decide what to do. I've also got some thoughts on how to have the discussion -- and the strategic aspects.

(Part 7 of Strategies for the free fediverses )

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Aren't you from that instance that threw a tantrum recently and threatened to defed the programming instance because of a personal beef between the admins that was quickly resolved and only resulted in creating a bunch of needless drama?

The above OP is right, it really says more about the servers advocating these things than Meta. Stop wallowing in the mud and just be better than them. Lead by example, not whatever this petty squabble is.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for getting what I was saying.

I'm giving meta a 3 strike rule for my instance. Yes, I will probably eventually defederate with them - but I'm not going to immediately do it now. Yes, they're a horrible company, horrible ethics, and I hate them. However, I'm not going to be one who just blocks them prematurely, they can prove themselves why they're terrible to me. I'll probably get overwhelmed with moderating and just cut it then.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you for fighting the good fight. That's the proper way to do it.

[–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

anyone can be better than company that experimented on teenagers