Greentext

4430 readers

976 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

444

Anon tries to manipulate Tinder (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 4 days ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

A quick Google shows that they charged over thirties in the UK double for a premium account.

Devils advocate says that is because older people are more like to have money (people are probably getting a bit more desperate at that age too).

It looks like the policy is revoked tho.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We should charge people based on their ability to pay for food too!

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We do it for taxes and in my opinion, it doesn't go far enough.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 3 days ago

We really don't... It is progressive only for people who work for money 🤡 up to few hundred k