this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
53 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16796 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
53
SAG-AFTRA Releases Full Terms Of AI Voice Agreement After Backlash From Members (www.gamespot.com)
submitted 10 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As long as there are decent minimums, I think that sounds like the best contract that could be negotiated. Completely disallowing it was never going to happen. The concern was that they'd be paid once and they out of a job forever, also preventing others from getting jobs as well. Instead, there are ongoing fees that support them instead. I think that's perfectly reasonable, unless there's no minimum fees for those things, and then it's a race to the bottom, and virtually no different than not getting fees at all.

Saying they deserve to lose their work is too much, though.

[–] money_loo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m specifically referencing all the fear mongers who think the AI is some evil threat and are still against its usage even under such a fair and restrictive contract.

This is really the best of both worlds for all parties, and as far as I could tell, the only people that might suffer are the consumers if the quality of the AI isn’t very good, but everybody else is still getting paid the same and more.

If you’re upset about that just because of the letters, AI then yeah you deserve to lose your job.

[–] steakmeout@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No matter how you attempt to justify your statement you’re plain wrong - nobody deserves to lose their work.