Technology

59589 readers

2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

698

D-Link refuses to patch yet another security flaw, suggests users just buy new routers — D-Link told users to replace NAS last week (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 3 days ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

142 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (30 children)

I mean this is pretty standard in all industries regardless of whether it's a software flaw or a physical flaw in any other kind of product. What's the likelihood of a vacuum manufacturer replacing a part in a 15 year old product that had a 1 year warrantee even if it's a safety issue? Sure the delivery and installation is cheaper with software, but the engineering and development isn't, especially if the environment for building it has to be recreated.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I work for a manufacturer with part catalogues going back to 1921, and while the telegraph codes no longer work, you could absolutely still order up a given part, or request from us the engineering diagram for it to aid in fabricating a replacement. You can also request service manuals, wiring diagrams, etc. Don't all half-decent manufacturers do this?

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now I wish you'd tell us what the company is so if I ever need anything in that industry, I'd know where to buy from.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wish I could be more specific, truly, but I would be putting myself at serious risk of doxxing myself, and I've made fun of a lot of bad people across Lemmy (and Reddit, once upon a time) that I would be putting myself and others at risk of retribution.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

That's fair. This being the Fediverse, private messages aren't private either, so protect yourself!

load more comments (10 replies)

load more comments (27 replies)