this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
279 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16856 readers
1216 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hector@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Terraria has all the ingredients of a great game:

  • passionate developers
  • great progression
  • great gameplay
  • great bosses
  • the sense of discovery and excitement is profound and enthralling
  • you dont need a good PC to run it

Every game tries to be the next big thing but they all seem to fail to understand that what made games like Minecraft so great was their portability/runnability !

Star Citizen is a prime example of that: tries so hard to be great, 99% of people can't run it. It doesn't matter. On the other hands: Terraria is a complete experience that has been gradually extended/improved/optimized and can run on almost any PC.

I'm looking for contradiction because I see no evidence of my take being wrong. That's also how League of Legends got so big: you could install it on high school PC lol

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Virtual worlds are affected by similar problems. If you look at e.g. Second Life, a relatively established one you will quickly realize it has all kinds of users with relatively minimal spec systems and use it in all kinds of contexts where they also do other stuff (e.g. work, watching kids,...). But people who try to build new ones tend to try to build them as VR which is completely useless to that entire user base because they can't afford a system that runs VR and also won't work in situations where you need to do other stuff at the same time.

Maybe what we need is more analysis and fewer visionaries.

[–] hector@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

You're so right! Vision by itself can only do so much if it's not helped with expertise. To be totally transparent I'm not super convinced by VR virtual worlds. I feel like Lemmy is a great "universe" because it's interoperate and it really gives it the independence that a true universe need to have!

The metaverse will not be built by a company but will emerge from a universal, accessible technology.

load more comments (5 replies)