this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
70 points (87.2% liked)

Fediverse

30254 readers
536 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 49 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I signed the pledge to not ever federate with them, and unlike the DARE pledges they made us sign in school, I'm taking this one seriously.

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

DARE to do drugs

DARE to keep threads defed'd

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do All Recreational Enhancers!

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dope Amphetamines Roofies Extacy

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I'm 3/4ths the way there.

[–] m_f@midwest.social 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The advantage of the Fediverse is exactly that, that each instance can decide if they federate or not. The thing that I'm wary of is a renewal of Embrace, extend, and extinguish. I'd like to think that Zuckerberg isn't going to try playing dirty tricks, but we'll see what happens if and when Threads ever becomes really successful.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

EEE would require existing Mastodon users moving to threads which I can't see happening

[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

EEE would require existing Mastodon users moving to threads

It would not.

Meta could implement ActivityPub in Facebook, and there's your majority population. Imagine a Facebook user "friending" your mastodon account. You follow them back because it's your mom, and so does basically everyone. Next, Facebook implements Pages to round off the concept of "communities." Then, Facebook introduces a genuinely useful extension - marketplace. Once a decent clip of people set up shop, trim off any instances that don't adopt the FriendlyPub fork.

Bam, EEE.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

Once a decent clip of people set up shop, trim off any instances that don't adopt the FriendlyPub fork.

And you'll be back at square one, as if Facebook hadn't federated in the first place. Which is essentially how the Fediverse is right now.

[–] m_f@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's a lot of shitty things they can do. They could push for changes to ActivityPub that nobody sane wants, confusing everybody that says "We support ActivityPub", and spread FUD about anyone that doesn't move to their new shitty version. Similar to how Google pushes through changes to web standards that benefit them, forcing Firefox to implement them too.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Then it's up to Mastodon not to bow to the changes. The worst thing that can happen is that we lose federation with Threads again.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you and others don't like Threads to begin with then why would the "extinguish" part ever work? The people who are already here aren't going to stop just because Threads federates and then later on unfederates.

[–] m_f@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I won't use threads, but the Fediverse is relatively small. It would suck if they managed to play dirty tricks and steal a large fraction of current fediverse users.