this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
532 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12525 readers
797 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Amairani Salinas was 32 weeks pregnant with her fourth child in 2023 when doctors at a Texas hospital discovered that her baby no longer had a heartbeat. As they prepped her for an emergency cesarean section, they gave her midazolam, a benzodiazepine commonly prescribed to keep patients calm. A day later, the grieving mother was cradling her stillborn daughter when a social worker stopped by her room to deliver another devastating blow: Salinas was being reported to child welfare authorities

What happened to Salinas and Villanueva are far from isolated incidents. Across the country, hospitals are dispensing medications to patients in labor, only to report them to child welfare authorities when they or their newborns test positive for those very same substances on subsequent drug tests, an investigation by The Marshall Project and Reveal has found.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 159 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Why are hospitals drug-testing pregnant women without their consent?

[–] cdf12345@lemm.ee 154 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Because in red states, cruelty is the point.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

Yup. Can't let beds in the for profit prisons go cold. Other wise the prisons CEO might have to spend only 199 days on vacation instead of the customary 200.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 98 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The article mentions it... TL;DR: War on Drugs

Hospital drug testing of pregnant women, which began in the 1980s and spread rapidly during the opioid epidemic, was intended in part to help identify babies who might experience withdrawal symptoms and need extra medical care. Federal law requires hospitals to alert child welfare agencies anytime such babies are born. But a previous investigation by The Marshall Project and Reveal found that the relatively inexpensive, pee-in-a-cup tests favored by many hospitals are highly susceptible to false positives, errors and misinterpretation — and many hospitals have failed to put in place safeguards that would protect patients from being reported over faulty test results.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 73 points 6 days ago (3 children)

was intended in part to help identify babies who might experience withdrawal symptoms

That was the stated reason to get public buy in. The real reason was the same as the rest of the war on drugs, to keep black people incarcerated so slavery can continue per the 14th amendment.

[–] Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

Lol, yeah, that started reason doesn't hold up well. Your basic urine drug screen (UDS) will flag benzos (midazolam in this article), natural opiates (not fentanyl and those derivatives), cocaine, barbiturates, marijuana, amphetamines, and I think that's it. The only ones likely to cause fetal withdrawal are benzos and opiates. Works well enough for benzos, but withdrawals are pretty rare. The most common are opiates, but the most common opiates won't show up on the UDS. So why use it?

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Citations Needed did an episode on the crack baby moral panic, but couldn't find it now.

Edit: I think it was this one but I'm not entirely sure:
Citations Needed: Episode 39: From Cradle to Courtroom: How The Media Stacks the Deck Against “Defendants”

Episode webpage: https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/citationsneeded/CN39_20180606_live_court_watch_nyc.mp3

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, there was no crack baby epidiemic for starters...

[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Citations needed uses heavy sarcasm. Though I don't recall the episode, I'm 100% they are highlighting the fact that there was not.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They talked about that, how the article that started the panic had to be retracted, but it didn't mattered at that point

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

As tends to be the case with racist fearmongering.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Its not a catch all thing to hide behind.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.earth 11 points 6 days ago

Honestly, it's much of a muchness, but for the sake of accuracy: It was the fetus that was tested, not the mother