Not The Onion

12529 readers

847 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

533

Hospitals gave patients meds during childbirth, then reported them for illicit drug use (www.usatoday.com)

submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Amairani Salinas was 32 weeks pregnant with her fourth child in 2023 when doctors at a Texas hospital discovered that her baby no longer had a heartbeat. As they prepped her for an emergency cesarean section, they gave her midazolam, a benzodiazepine commonly prescribed to keep patients calm. A day later, the grieving mother was cradling her stillborn daughter when a social worker stopped by her room to deliver another devastating blow: Salinas was being reported to child welfare authorities

What happened to Salinas and Villanueva are far from isolated incidents. Across the country, hospitals are dispensing medications to patients in labor, only to report them to child welfare authorities when they or their newborns test positive for those very same substances on subsequent drug tests, an investigation by The Marshall Project and Reveal has found.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 46 points 6 days ago (3 children)

One of the considerations should be, "I just gave this person a drug and they tested positive afterwards."

Unless there's other evidence of active drug use, the only assumption should be that it's positive because of the drugs you gave them.

[–] dion_starfire@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's possible the form listed the drugs she was on, but the social worker didn't know it was their job to figure out which results to ignore.

I've literally seen a Texas judge - who not only presumably court ordered drug tests regularly, but was also an ex-nurse - not understand how drug tests work. She assumed the lab would eliminate prescription-caused positives from the results. It took subpoenaing the tech who administered the test - a person in the same courthouse - to take the stand and tell the judge "we just list what the test found and what meds the person said they were taking, it's someone else's job to cross reference the two" before the judge stopped assuming the person on prescription Adderall was a meth head.

If an ex-nurse who deals with drug tests on a nearly daily basis doesn't understand how they work, I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turned out that a social worker misinterpreted the results similarly.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

Just take the safety labels off of everything and let the idiots maim themselves to death at this point. I don’t have faith in this society.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Just take the blood sample before administering the drugs?

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

I only read the comments, but my impression is that the drugs were given before c section and it was the newborn that was tested and not the mother.