this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
256 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 days ago (4 children)
[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

I didn't even read the article. I just barely skimmed it and guess what I found within 2 seconds.

"Balaji’s death comes three months after he publicly accused OpenAI of violating U.S. copyright law while developing ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence program that has become a moneymaking sensation used by hundreds of millions of people across the world."

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

He had hard proof chat gpt used copyright work to train. Opening them up to lawsuits of said copyright holders and basically collapsing the whole company.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You don’t even need “Hard” proof. The mere fact that ChatGPT “knows” about certain things indicate that it ingested certain copyrighted works. There are countless examples. Can it quote a book you like? Does it know the plot details? There is no other way for it to get certain information about such things.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

The issue is proving that it ingested the original copyrighted work, and not some hypothetical public copyleft essay.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It was more of an opinion piece. They were already being sued and he didn't bring any new info forward from what I understand.