this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
84 points (83.3% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3185 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I got to leave RS-232 behind a couple years ago when I no longer needed to maintain my own rack switches. My condolences.

[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It might be old and slow, but I love RS-232. It works on every platform, you can write a client or server in just about any programming language in a handful of lines (and understand what they all do). I’ve literally made working RS-232 connections with paperclips and scotch tape. After the corpo wars when we’re all computing on salvaged tech you’ll come to appreciate it.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Not just programming languages either, the hardware side is dead simple too. You can literally implement it in a few lines of VHDL or similar language on an FPGA.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

It's like telnet, I'm happy to know its there when I need it but I'd rather not need it.