this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
745 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

4751 readers
1116 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Definitely, Dumbledore is much better in the movies. I think the books overexplore his relationship with Voldemort and he comes off a bit daft. All of his interactions with Voldemort are like:

Voldemort: Genocide is cool, right?

Dumbledore: No, it isn't

V: You're right. Anyway, theoretically, how can I become more stronger?

D: Are you gonna do a genocide?

V: high pitched Whaaaaat...?! Naaaaaaaah! I would never do that!

D: Ok, here's how you become more powerful...

[–] colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Dumbledore is much better in the movies

This is a hot take I’ve never heard before

[–] tetris11@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He's a man of ACTION in the films, and not a man of giving fools a second chance.

Dumbledore in the books has my heart, but Dumbledore in the films has my sword

[–] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

A turd is better when you can both see and smell it rather than when you can only smell it