this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
350 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

15975 readers
1308 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 69 points 3 months ago (4 children)

See, what I'M hearing is that united for years denied people health care that they NEEDED. Then their CEO gets capped, and now all the sudden united is like "Whaaaaat??? We would NEVER do something that put patients lives at risk......wasn't us! We're being good boys now."

Which tells me that Luigi had a direct impact. Before these CEOs were like "I do what I want!!!" And with no consequences, they did what they want.

NOW these CEOs are like "HOLY FUCK!!! THESE GUYS ARE BRINGING CONSEQUENCES!!!! COOL THE HEAT!!! COOL THE HEAT!!!

And now they're rethinking their ways. Not stopping mind you, but trying to appear less like something the devil running a company would do.

So thank you Luigi. Somewhere out there in the world right now is someone getting their care approved, whereas without you, it would have been denied.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Huh? This is like the 3rd shit they've tried to pull since the CEO was killed. They clearly don't care about changing their ways. They only backtrack when there's publicity.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

3rd? It's all but certain that there are tens of thousands of other examples of this BS that haven't been reported.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

You're right. It's the third shit that's gotten media attention.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 3 months ago

So thank you Luigi. Somewhere out there in the world right now is someone getting their care approved, whereas without you, it would have been denied.

Literally saving lives by killing a mass murderer.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, that’s fucking delusional. The correct answer is that they know what the doctor did risked a patient’s life and/or complicated their surgery, and they don’t want to be in any way able to be received as liable.

“Of course we wouldn’t force a doctor to leave surgery, that’s ridiculous.” Is covering their asses from lawsuit, plain and simple. If they said “oh we are sorry for the confusion” or “we are glad that the doctor took the time to resolve the issues asap, that’s great patient care” they would be immediately eviscerated in the courts.

Their only course of action is to respond as through they’re unaware of the culture of fear they’ve created (and, tbh, they might actually fucking be unaware). This response is legal & PR 101 and regardless of their actual evil deeds is pretty much the only sane way for them to respond.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

To even doubt that they're aware would be a huge misstep.

Being aware of it and creating this problem is their bottom line. That's how they steal money from their customers and leave them with crippling debt or without medical care for profit.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

You're close! It's more like, this story would have never come to light pre-Luigi.