this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
7 points (76.9% liked)
Selfhosted
60048 readers
828 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam.
-
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You wanna know a fun way to do this?
GitHub (and I think Gitlab too) supports you running their runner within your own infra. It’s literally a binary that needs permissions and space. Then, you can tell your git repo to use that runner to run docker compose and as part of the “build” process, deploy you container to the same or an in-network machine.
This is not secure, it’s probably going to involve a lot of hard coding of local IPs or server names etc. But you can make it work.
I use this way to get a Win11 PC to run some regular containers on itself. Works like a charm.
I did this and the fun thing about it is that your runner can access things inside your network that a regular GitLab runner can't. I've used it to manage a k8s cluster that isn't exposed to the Internet at all.