this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
663 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

77635 readers
2956 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 271 points 10 months ago (17 children)

While the company stops short of directly saying as much, it sure feels like the preposterously long ads we’re seeing here are an example of one tool in Google’s arsenal for effectively disabling YouTube playback for violators of the site’s ToS.

That makes no sense at all. It isn't like skipping ads results in a black screen for the length of the ad.

People with adblockers aren't going to see hour long ads or black screens when they don't see ads in the first place.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (10 children)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All that does is make YouTube money while costing money to the advertisers.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How long do you think those advertisers will stay when it turns out they've paid $1M in advertising with no change in sales?

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I hear what you are saying but the truth is that they will stay, just so they aren't missing, regardless of ROI. Case in point is Xitter. The numbers clearly state that the level of engagement and sales conversion from Xitter ads is pitiful, especially when compared to Bluesky, yet advertisers still hang in there...just in case.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

That's because at a certain point ads become less about direct sales, and more about brand recognition. This is why Coke has a massive advertising budget. You know what Coke is. You're either going to buy a Coke or you're not. But by advertising as heavily as they do, they're reminding you that they exist.

That's why their heaviest advertising season is Christmas. Some of the advertisements don't even show their product. Some do, but some just show Santa flying his sleigh with cheery christmas music. Then their Coke logo gets spelled out in the stars as he passes by.

It's just so you assosiate their brand with good emotions. But it requires an almost constant barrage of ads, and it's direct sales are impossible to measure.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The advertising team will just blame it on something else. They have the numbers showing their ads are being watched, everything else is conjecture.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

deleted by creator

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)