this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
63 points (90.9% liked)

Games

16806 readers
946 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's basically Starcraft 2, meshed with Warcraft 3, with creep camps.

So... a moba with some RTS in it? Because that's exactly what WC3 plays like, with a huge focus on levelling your heroes, and everything else a sidenote. That's why I liked SC2 much more, it's actually an realtime tactics game, not a moba with baggage.

Don't get me wrong, I like the 3vE concept, and the story campaign. But I hate the moba-style hero focus.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

... Moba started with a warcraft mod. You might have heard of it, it's called DOTA. Warcraft is a staple of RTS, and so is Starcraft. Both had "hero units" since forever - with the campaigns in Starcraft featuring hunter killers (hero hydralisks) for example, later in 2 featuring Jim, Kerrigan, Artanis. It's nothing new really, and it's really unfair to say that an rts that features heroes, like Warcraft, makes it a moba with some RTS in it.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

There's a huge gap between the SC2 (and especially SC1) heroes, or C&C/RA heroes, and the WC3 hero units. For starters, in SC they only appeared in the campaign, not multiplayer, and that's totally fine with a narrative story campaign. In WC3 the heroes were absolutely the most game-defining feature, if you played a slightly suboptimal creep-run and didn't level your heroes quickly enough, it didn't matter one bit how well you did everything else. Hero-micro was absolutely the main component of most multiplayer matches, kill the enemy hero and you win.

The problem isn't having heroes in the game. The problem is when they become WC3-powerful, because then the game stops being tactics and troops and RTS, and starts play like a moba with slightly better creep-control. There's nothing with a Moba+RTSelements game, if it's fun, it's fun and all power to them. But I'm really hoping it won't be that. Gimme SC2/C&C gameplay any day over WC3

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What does the hero unit's strength matter if they're just in the campaign or coop modes?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, they are campaign and coop only. No hero units in 1v1. Also, even in the campaign, there is no levelling them up. They're just beefy named units with unique abilities.