this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
60 points (98.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62762 readers
316 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Businesses and institutions need VPNs to function. Getting rid of them would be an absolute disaster.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Businesses using VPNs is an entirely different matter. It's possible to outlaw VPN services or rather make them usable for piracy. E.g. requiring VPN providers to know who their users are and providing info to law enforcement wouldn't impact businesses at all.

A similar example are emulators: Depending on how laws are interpreted it's entirely possible that there's no way to legally emulate Nintendo Switch. This wouldn't prevent Nintendo or any other company to emulate their own hardware.

Outlawing encryption unless your a politician is also something which gets brought up from time to time. Laws are full exceptions.

TL;Dr
There're many ways to outlaw only a specific use case without

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

I agree, it's inane. But just like wanting back doors to e2e encryption, some idiot politicians will push for it despite for sure.