this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
106 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3397 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Supreme Court rejects Epic v. Apple antitrust case::The Supreme Court has rejected petitions by Epic and Apple to reconsider a ruling on Fortnite’s iOS ban and potential changes to the App Store.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Supreme Court has denied a request to hear an antitrust dispute between Apple and Fortnite publisher Epic Games.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers rejected most of Apple’s claims and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals largely affirmed the decision.

But the company spent years delaying parts of the change with legal appeals, winning a reprieve while the Supreme Court considered the case.

Today’s denial seemingly runs out that clock, requiring Apple to reconsider the future of its anti-steering rules.

Apple may also face more pressure to open up iOS in Europe; it’s currently fighting attempts to regulate the App Store under the EU’s Digital Markets Act, which goes into effect on March 7th.

In a thread of social media posts, Epic CEO Tim Sweeney said that “the court battle to open iOS to competing stores and payments is lost in the United States,” dubbing it “a sad outcome for all developers.” But he celebrated the end of anti-steering rules, urging developers to “begin exercising their court-established right to tell US customers about better prices on the web.” Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the Supreme Court’s decision.


The original article contains 394 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 52%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!