Linux

50355 readers

1022 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Difference between Github, Gitlab, Forgejo ? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by dengtav@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Another "Differences in Linux" question :)

I often wonder, what exactly is the difference between this services?

I understand, that:

github.com is a company, where as gitlab and forgejo are (softwares)?
They all "manage/wrap/interface with" git?

Questions:

what software does github.com use?
whats the difference between them (pros/cons)?
what about self-hosting? Possibilities/Preferences?

As always, thanks beforehand :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] iriyan@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

gittea is also a company now, forgejo is open and free, trully free

other than codeberg disroot has been running forgejo too I wouldn't want to use anything but forgejo

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Truly free… yet in its fork of Gitea it is copying more Microsoft GitHub features like Action YAML spaghetti instead of offering an improvement. Instead of being a better offering than Microsoft, they are cloning even more features where it is even more of a hard sell IMO by not offering anything new in the experience.

[–] iriyan@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

The difference with a small group of devs writing code and offering it free and corporate thugs treating coders like sponges to produce code is the lack of resources can be understood and forgiven. Take a project like brave-nightly (browser fork of glugle-elechrom) there are 3-5-8 new releases a day, 8-6 Pacific US time, when they go home on Fri. the next release is Monday afternoon, the "free" coders usually begin work Friday night and end Monday at dawn!

Sure, corp.XYZ sends them an offer one day and buys their work and even offers them incentives to work for them, then it all goes down hill!

It ends up being as nasty racist and ethnocentric as kernel.org.com - us state dept fed and controlled