this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
624 points (99.1% liked)

Greentext

5664 readers
1020 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works 155 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Post-industrial Buddhism is what it is. Yeah like it'd be great to do that in a cave or forest or open prairie but who the fuck can afford those things?

Abandoned buildings are free as long as you don't fuck with the native inhabitants' meth.

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would just worry of asbestos or heavy metal contamination in the buildings, especially if I'm sleeping on or near the floor

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 4 points 20 hours ago

Are you worried about this sort of thing in general? I would argue that these things are pretty esoteric concerns.

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 8 points 23 hours ago

All the good caves are taken.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (7 children)

who the fuck can afford those things?

Anybody? Where do you live that hanging out in the forest costs money?

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Transportation to and from the forest isn't free.

Also some places have laws against camping on public land to discourage homelessness and these would likely fall afoul of those.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I promose you those places also have laws against camping on private property in an abandoned building.

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but not as many people go to abandoned buildings so you're less likely to be seen by others and reported.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago

I'd be way more concerned about running into someone in a 'bando than out in the woods though.

Hiker in the woods is going to go the other way. A homebum in a bando? Who knows how they'll react.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the middle of a city, which doesn't have nearby forests.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we're talking about the US, that's no city I've ever seen except maybe the southwest

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You've never seen an abandoned building in Baltimore, DC Philadelphia, Detroit, or Chicago?

Outside of the tourist zone you can find wastelands of abandoned buildings.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not doubting there are abandoned buildings in cities. I'm doubting any city within the US with the exception of the southwest is more than a few miles from a forest.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Oh ok. But to refute your forest idea, while there are forests a few miles outside those cities, you can't easily walk to them. There also aren't any forests near those major cities where you wouldn't immediately be noticed by park rangers if you tried setting up a random tent. Abandoned buildings don't get daily police sweeps whereas parks do get sweeps because of lost/injured at nightfall when the parks close to everyone without a camping permit. And legal camp sites are very popular so you wouldn't be getting away from people- like those who have their playlists blasting out their phone while hiking.

[–] algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OP didn't mean the cost of going there, they meant still paying the bills while going to the forest instead of work

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

That's still going to be a problem living in an abandoned building though. That part doesn't change regardless of where their friend goes to meditate (unless that place is work I guess)

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

murrca.

there are no commons.

[–] currycourier@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Actually the larger parks near me (the only places that have enough trees to qualify as something close to a forest) do cost money (american city metro area)

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What forest? Most people live nowhere near a forest

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most American cities have a forest within a few miles. Our largest city, for example, has 50 acres of forest right in the Bronx.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most people don't live in America either

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Most people on 4chan do