this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
522 points (98.7% liked)

Memes

48655 readers
2049 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

I've been thinking a lot recently about how to rephrase socialist ideals as capitalist bills for the sake of America.

I want to propose a "Proof of Economic Viability Bill" somewhere if I can find the right influence point.

Basically, financial advisors suggest that people should pay no more than 30% of their income towards living expenses. Knowing that the vast majority of Americans only have income from their primary job, this means that any business should be expected to pay no less than 30% of their income, evenly divided across the entire workforce (cart pusher to CEO), as a "living expense allotment" to prove they can afford to pay their workers enough to live and stay afloat. This will push out companies who are doomed to fail because of a lack of available workforce, allowing more economically viable options to reign king.

Edit to add: you can make this sound a little nicer to the maga crowd by telling them they can reduce wages by doing this. I don't necessarily care that you're paying minimum wage as long as you can afford to put your worker in a home and fill their stomach.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

You just described what the minimum wage was supposed to be, and plenty of red blooded American patriots already hate that.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I realize my other comment didn't actually properly answer your concern. You are right about this being the equivalent of minimum wage. However, the meaning of wages have changed since the time when those laws were made. We don't need companies to prove they can pay their people for today, because we have technology that lasts hundreds of years if properly maintained. We need them to prove they are economically viable forever.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

You're absolutely right. However, if you use the right magic words you can convince them that it will be good for them. Constituents will be happy because their bills will be guaranteed to be paid by their company, and investors will be happy because they can look at a company and instantly see whether they can make money off it. It just so happens that politicians tend to be into the same things as investors

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Stop using polysyallabic words like "proletariat" when trying to appeal to the American working class who read at a 5th grade level.

Seriously. Like the guy in Severance said. Apologize for the word. It's too long.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

No no, you just have to use the right ones that they like. The "magic words" so to speak. Investors really like "economic viability" because it means they can instantly look at a company and see if they can make money off it. Politicians just so happen to be interested in a lot of the same things as investors for some reason.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 14 hours ago

I go even simpler.

The New Deal.

Make the GOPs explain why we could pay salaries that let one earner support a family of four in 1940 and can't do it today.