this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
550 points (83.5% liked)

Memes

45719 readers
1057 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Justas@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks.

I avoid random X/Twitter links like the plague, since that platform is full of Deceptive Imagery Persuasion. Any video or photo can be taken out of context to mean the wrong thing. I could not find the CNN's original video, maybe someday it will be easier to search for them.

I have been using Google for long enough to know that it often shows us what we want to see, not that which is most likely to be correct. :)

Characterizing the Influence of Confirmation Bias on Web Search Behavior It's not just you, Google Search really has gotten worse

Now I see the foundations of your beliefs I can better understand your opinions. I still do not agree with them though, because I believe those foundations to be somewhere between flawed and ideology-driven.

First of all, Euromaidan was a coup, by it's definition, but it was not instigated by the west, which I assumed was your opinion.

Regarding Russian economic data you seem to be flaunting, Russia has made it hard for outside sources to verify any of it.

Pollution Reveals What Russian Statistics Obscure: Industrial Decline Russian Economic Optimism Is Based on Suspect Data

I yet or bothered to translate the German or French links, but a lot of other articles I actually mostly agree with: Ukraine will struggle to achieve their objectives without western aid despite past successes.

You seem to derive a lot of your opinions from mearsheimer.substack.com source but the sources the author uses to prove your points often come from rt.com which is like, the worst source for this discussion.

I understand that these Internet debates are not for changing minds of my opponents, but to show my points to people who are not yet decided.

I will, however, refrain from posting on lemmy.ml in the future, because I can see that you are a mod of several communities on this instance and your overall conduct in this post has been rather childish and disrespectful. I feel like mods should hold themselves to a higher standard.

[โ€“] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The fact that the west was deeply involved in the coup is well documented even in western media

The foundations of my beliefs are that the west saw itself as the winner of the cold war after USSR dissolved, and decided to renege on all the promises that were made in the 90s. This created increasing tensions with Russia, and eventually led to the war we're seeing play out in Ukraine. This is a proxy war between NATO and Russia, and it's following the script that was outlined by RAND.

The west made a huge miscalculation thinking that it could defeat Russia militarily and economically, and now the whole thing is starting to backfire. NATO is finding that it lacks the industrial base to sustain the conflict. Russia managed to reroute its trade away from the west, which caused immeasurable economic damage to Europe. The world outside the G7 has been increasingly aligning towards Russia and China and away from the west. This proxy war is heralding the end of the unipolar moment that US enjoyed and ushering in multipolarity.

I have been using Google for long enough to know that it often shows us what we want to see, not that which is most likely to be correct. :)

Have you considered that this might be why you still think that Ukraine is winning despite all the evidence to the contrary?

Regarding Russian economic data you seem to be flaunting, Russia has made it hard for outside sources to verify any of it.

Every mainstream western outlet, including the IMF, agrees that Russian economy is growing. No serious economists dispute this.

You seem to derive a lot of your opinions from mearsheimer.substack.com source but the sources the author uses to prove your points often come from rt.com which is like, the worst source for this discussion.

Mearsheimer is just one example, and he is a preeminent political scientist in the US. The reality is that there is propaganda in the west just like there is in Russia, and western media often omits covering things that RT covers. Simply dismissing information based on the source is frankly absurd.

Incidentally, Mearsheimer gave an entire lecture back in 2014 predicting the events in Ukraine that are currently unfolding, seems to me that he might know what he's talking about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4

I will, however, refrain from posting on lemmy.ml in the future, because I can see that you are a mod of several communities on this instance and your overall conduct in this post has been rather childish and disrespectful. I feel like mods should hold themselves to a higher standard.

Don't let the door hit you on the way out.