this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
255 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

69154 readers
3041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 49 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

Generated AI CP should be illegalized even if its creation did not technically harm anyone. The reason is, presumably it looks too close to real CP, so close that it: 1) normalizes consumption of CP, 2) grows a market for CP, and 3) Real CP could get off the hook by claiming it is AI.

While there are similar reasons to be against clearly not real CP (e.g. hentai), this type at least does not have problem #3. For example, there doesnt need to be an investigation into whether a picture is real or not.

[–] Nyoka@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Fun fact it's already illegal. If it's indistinguishable from the real thing it's a crime.

[–] raptir@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I was under the impression that even clearly drawn it's already illegal, though it's a grey area since they can say "lol it's a 1000 year old demon that just looks like a child." Is that not the case?

[–] Nyoka@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Clearly drawn is hard to prosecute (and one might argue shouldn't be prosecuted, since obscenity laws are just... weird). However, the stuff that is photorealistic can be treated, legally, like the real thing.

[–] raptir@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's interesting and led me down a wikipedia rabbit hole. So the law in the US says that fictional child pornography (i.e., where it is drawn and this is not "indistinguishable" from a minor) is illegal if it is "obscene." And the definition of "obscene" essentially comes down to "would the average member of the community find it offensive."

That takes "grey area" to a whole new level.

load more comments (12 replies)