this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
249 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 21 points 10 months ago (21 children)

Ipv6 is the replacement for ipv4. There now exist networks without ipv4

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 10 months ago (17 children)

To expand on this, we have functionally ran out of IPv4 addresses. Meaning IPv6 addresses are required.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 12 points 10 months ago (15 children)

Not only that, but ipv6 makes networking easier and less complicated. No longer, needing port forwarding or NAT, amongst other improvements

[–] Blackmist@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's that necessarily a good thing?

I remember suddenly needing a firewall on my PC back in the days of the Blaster worm.

Do we really want all those crappy IoT devices open on all ports to the general internet?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 9 points 10 months ago

NAT is not security. We aren't talking about replacing friewalls.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)